ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Nutritional Management Mode of Early Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symptom characteristics in patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection surgery post-discharge phase: a prospective observational study.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
- Prediction model of ICU readmission in Chinese patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Retracted: Nutritional Management Mode of Early Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/26E5DA8E7AEF27389F4BD839E206BC
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition and metabolic disorders are common problems faced by patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection after surgery. Some patients have dietary problems such as malnutrition, unbalanced diet, and poor eating habits before surgery. Therefore, the nutritional management of early heart health can improve the nutritional support for perioperative recovery, to improve the pertinence. Therefore, active nutritional support after surgery will help to change malnutrition and metabolism and is of great significance to postoperative recovery and quality of life. This paper is aimed at studying the nutritional management mode of early cardiac rehabilitation in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection. Based on the analysis of the pathogenesis of aortic dissection and the diagnosis of aortic dissection, two groups of patients were given individualized nutritional management scheme and routine nutritional scheme, respectively, and the nutritional risk differences between the two groups under different schemes were compared. The results showed that there was a statistical difference between the two groups at discharge. The NRS-2002 score of 14 cases in the observation group was less than 3 after nutritional intervention, indicating that there was no nutritional risk at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.