Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035291›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

A Hybrid Approach Based on Deep CNN and Machine Learning Classifiers for the Tumor Segmentation and Classification in Brain MRI.

Ejaz Ul Haq, Huang Jianjun, Xu Huarong, Kang Li, Lifen Weng

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ejaz Ul HaqGuangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-0708
Huang JianjunGuangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-3591
Xu HuarongSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-7072
Kang LiGuangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, China.
Lifen WengSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional medical imaging and machine learning techniques are not perfect enough to correctly segment the brain tumor in MRI as the proper identification and segmentation of tumor borders are one of the most important criteria of tumor extraction. The existing approaches are time-consuming, incursive, and susceptible to human mistake. These drawbacks highlight the importance of developing a completely automated deep learning-based approach for segmentation and classification of brain tumors. The expedient and prompt segmentation and classification of a brain tumor are critical for accurate clinical diagnosis and adequately treatment. As a result, deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation and classification algorithms are extensively employed. In the deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation and classification technique, the CNN model has an excellent brain segmentation and classification effect. In this work, an integrated and hybrid approach based on deep convolutional neural network and machine learning classifiers is proposed for the accurate segmentation and classification of brain MRI tumor. A CNN is proposed in the first stage to learn the feature map from image space of brain MRI into the tumor marker region. In the second step, a faster region-based CNN is developed for the localization of tumor region followed by region proposal network (RPN). In the last step, a deep convolutional neural network and machine learning classifiers are incorporated in series in order to further refine the segmentation and classification process to obtain more accurate results and findings. The proposed model's performance is assessed based on evaluation metrics extensively used in medical image processing. The experimental results validate that the proposed deep CNN and SVM-RBF classifier achieved an accuracy of 98.3% and a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 97.8% on the task of classifying brain tumors as gliomas, meningioma, or pituitary using brain dataset-1, while on Figshare dataset, it achieved an accuracy of 98.0% and a DSC of 97.1% on classifying brain tumors as gliomas, meningioma, or pituitary. The segmentation and classification results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art techniques by a significant margin.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID36035291
PMCPMC9400402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.