Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035289›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

The Predominance of a Specific Genotype of

Jian Zhu, Jiafei Cao, Tingying Li, Qi Liu, Yingqian Kang, Zhenghong Chen, Wieland Meyer, Yuzuru Mikami, Mei Long

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retracted: The Predominance of a Specific Genotype ofComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guizhou Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou 550014, China.
Jiafei CaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, China.
Tingying LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Guiyang Second People Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, China.
Yingqian KangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Guizhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China.
Zhenghong ChenDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Guizhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology of Guizhou Province, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China.
Wieland MeyerMolecular Mycology Research Laboratory, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Sydney Medical School-Westmead Hospital (Research and Education Network), Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Yuzuru MikamiMedical Mycology Research Center (MMRC), Chiba University, China.
Mei LongDepartment of Pediatrics, Guiyang Second People Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7652-413X
Guiyang Medical University · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The extensive deployment of molecular genotyping methods is the top reliable keyword to characterize the population genetic structure of Objectives: We address this challenge to determine the genotype distribution of Methods: Genotypic analysis of 52 Results: MLMT classified 46 (88.5%) of the 52 strains as genotype MLMT-17. The high prevalence of the MLMT-17 type was observed for environmental and clinical isolates from China and Japan. Conclusions: Our study suggests the predominance of a specific genotype of

Indexed as

CryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansGenotypeHumansJapanMultilocus Sequence TypingMycological Typing Techniques

Identifiers

PMID36035289
PMCPMC9410922
OpenAlexW4289914337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.