ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Rib Fracture Detection with Dual-Attention Enhanced U-Net.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Rib Fracture on X-ray and Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Detection, Classification, and Segmentation of Rib Fractures From CT Data Using Deep Learning Models: A Review of Literature and Pooled Analysis.Journal of thoracic imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning for acute rib fracture detection in CT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning and hybrid architectures for atypical and complex bone fracture diagnosis: a systematic review of performance and clinical validity.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Deep learning in rib fracture imaging: study quality assessment using the Must AI Criteria-10 (MAIC-10) checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Multi-stream and multi-scale fusion rib fracture segmentation network based on UXNet.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Detecting Rib Fractures on Chest Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rib fractures are common injuries caused by chest trauma, which may cause serious consequences. It is essential to diagnose rib fractures accurately. Low-dose thoracic computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for rib fracture diagnosis, and convolutional neural network- (CNN-) based methods have assisted doctors in rib fracture diagnosis in recent years. However, due to the lack of rib fracture data and the irregular, various shape of rib fractures, it is difficult for CNN-based methods to extract rib fracture features. As a result, they cannot achieve satisfying results in terms of accuracy and sensitivity in detecting rib fractures. Inspired by the attention mechanism, we proposed the CFSG U-Net for rib fracture detection. The CSFG U-Net uses the U-Net architecture and is enhanced by a dual-attention module, including a channel-wise fusion attention module (CFAM) and a spatial-wise group attention module (SGAM). CFAM uses the channel attention mechanism to reweight the feature map along the channel dimension and refine the U-Net's skip connections. SGAM uses the group technique to generate spatial attention to adjust feature maps in the spatial dimension, which allows the spatial attention module to capture more fine-grained semantic information. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed methods, we established a rib fracture dataset in our research. The experimental results on our dataset show that the maximum sensitivity of our proposed method is 89.58%, and the average FROC score is 81.28%, which outperforms the existing rib fracture detection methods and attention modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.