Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035241›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Incidence of Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis in Screening Dilated Exams in Patients with Elevated Beta-D-Glucan Levels versus Positive Fungal Blood Cultures.

Viren K Govindaraju, Jonathan T Chao, Elizabeth R Duvall, Nicolas S Baker, Kelly M Fahey, Ramon Lee, George A Williams, Lori A Stec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prevalence of Ocular Candidiasis and Candida Endophthalmitis in Patients With Candidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Viren K GovindarajuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Jonathan T ChaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Elizabeth R DuvallDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Nicolas S BakerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Kelly M FaheyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Ramon LeeDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Associated Retinal Consultants, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
George A WilliamsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Lori A StecDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a severe intraocular infectious condition requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. This study examines the incidence of fungal endophthalmitis in patients with elevated beta-D-glucan (BG) levels and those with positive blood culture and the utility of ophthalmology consultation in these patients. Methods: Single center retrospective consecutive cohort study was conducted on patients at Beaumont Health from 2016-2021 who either had positive fungal blood cultures or an elevated BG level. Results: A total of 147 patients were examined by the ophthalmology department where 30 patients had an elevated BG level and 100 patients had a positive fungal blood culture. Incidence of fungal endophthalmitis was 0% in the elevated BG group and 1.5% in the positive fungal culture group, corresponding to a relative risk ratio of 0.0 (p = 0.31). Conclusion: BG testing may be useful in diagnosing isolated cases outside the standard screening paradigm, however the data within this study support the conclusion that there is no compelling evidence at this time to add or use BG as a surrogate for endophthalmitis screening. Further studies are required to further elucidate the role of BG in the care of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

candidemiachorioretinitisendophthalmitisinfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID36035241
PMCPMC9416315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.