ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022
Strategies for tackling the class imbalance problem of oropharyngeal primary tumor segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Pooled it
- Towards Reliable Healthcare Imaging: A Multifaceted Approach in Class Imbalance Handling for Medical Image Segmentation.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Image-based mandibular and maxillary parcellation and annotation using computed tomography (IMPACT): a deep learning-based clinical tool for orodental dose estimation and osteoradionecrosis assessment.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Image-based Mandibular and Maxillary Parcellation and Annotation using Computer Tomography (IMPACT): A Deep Learning-based Clinical Tool for Orodental Dose Estimation and Osteoradionecrosis Assessment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Overview of the Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation for Magnetic Resonance Guided Applications (HNTS-MRG) 2024 Challenge.Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation for MR-Guided Applications : First MICCAI Challenge, HNTS-MRG 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 17, 2024, proceedings · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolving Horizons in Radiation Therapy Auto-Contouring: Distilling Insights, Embracing Data-Centric Frameworks, and Moving Beyond Geometric Quantification.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep-learning magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic segmentation for organs-at-risk in the brain: Accuracy and impact on dose distribution.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Challenges and chances for deep-learning based target and organ at risk segmentation in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Contouring oropharyngeal primary tumors in radiotherapy is currently done manually which is time-consuming. Autocontouring techniques based on deep learning methods are a desirable alternative, but these methods can render suboptimal results when the structure to segment is considerably smaller than the rest of the image. The purpose of this work was to investigate different strategies to tackle the class imbalance problem in this tumor site. Materials and methods: A cohort of 230 oropharyngeal cancer patients treated between 2010 and 2018 was retrospectively collected. The following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were available: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, 3D T1-weighted after gadolinium injection. Two strategies to tackle the class imbalance problem were studied: training with different loss functions (namely: Dice loss, Generalized Dice loss, Focal Tversky loss and Unified Focal loss) and implementing a two-stage approach (i.e. splitting the task in detection and segmentation). Segmentation performance was measured with Sørensen-Dice coefficient (Dice), 95th Hausdorff distance (HD) and Mean Surface Distance (MSD). Results: The network trained with the Generalized Dice Loss yielded a median Dice of 0.54, median 95th HD of 10.6 mm and median MSD of 2.4 mm but no significant differences were observed among the different loss functions (p-value > 0.7). The two-stage approach resulted in a median Dice of 0.64, median HD of 8.7 mm and median MSD of 2.1 mm, significantly outperforming the end-to-end 3D U-Net (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed when training with different loss functions. The two-stage approach outperformed the end-to-end 3D U-Net.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.