Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035074›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2022

Psychometric Properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to Detect Major Neurocognitive Disorder Among Older People in Ethiopia: A Validation Study.

Beniam Daniel, Liyew Agenagnew, Abdulhalik Workicho, Mubarek Abera

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06927362 (Effects of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Big and Dual Task Training on Balance, Cognition and Functional Mobility in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06927362 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment Big and Dual Task Training on Balance, Cognition and Functional Mobility in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsCognitive Impairment, Balance Changes, Cognition Disorders in Old Age, Functional MobilityArmsLee Silverman treatment big, Dual task training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beniam DanielDepartment of Psychiatry, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4112-1509
Liyew AgenagnewDepartment of Psychiatry, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4181-1489
Abdulhalik WorkichoDepartment of Epidemiology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Mubarek AberaDepartment of Psychiatry, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognition is one of the most complex functions of the human brain, and major neurocognitive disorders affect this function causing a wide array of problems in an individual's life. Screening for major neurocognitive disorders can be helpful in designing and implementing early interventions. Purpose: This study was designed to assess the reliability and validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool to detect major neurocognitive disorders among older people in Ethiopia. Methods: One hundred and sixteen randomly selected older adults in Ethiopia were involved in a cross-sectional study. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for major neurocognitive disorders was used as a gold standard. Data were analyzed using STATA v16 statistical software. Receiver operating curve analysis was performed, and inter-rater, internal consistency reliabilities, content, criterion and construct validities were determined. Statistically significance was declared at a p-value of <0.05. Results: The study had a 100% response rate. The mean age of the study participants was 69.87 ± 7.8. The inter-rater reliability value was 0.96, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.79. The optimal cutoff value was ≤21, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment has an area under curve value of 0.89. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and positive and negative predictive values of MoCA are 87.18%, 74.03%, 3.35, 0.17, 63%, and 91.9%, respectively. The tool also has good concurrent and construct validities. Conclusion: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool was a reliable and valid tool to detect major neurocognitive disorder. It can be incorporated into the clinical and research practices in developing countries.

Indexed as

Ethiopiamajor neuro-cognitive disorderMontreal Cognitive Assessmentvalidity and reliability

Identifiers

PMID36035074
PMCPMC9416441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.