ReviewCureus2022
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalizable and explainable deep learning for brain MRI: a multi-cohort evaluation of 3D architectures for age and sex prediction.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical Profile and Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Findings Among Patients With Cerebrovascular Stroke.Cureus · 2025Article
- [Imaging Diagnosis of Ischemic Stroke Through Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Angiography Enhanced by NaGdFSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Evaluation of MRI Safety of Ru-106 Eye Applicators.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2025Article
- The Necessity of Using MRI as an Imaging Modality in Acute Code Stroke in Indonesia.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Spectral imaging and analysis of monophasic CT angiography to assess infarct core and penumbra in acute stroke.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Retinal Imaging-Based Oculomics: Artificial Intelligence as a Tool in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Feasibility of CT attenuation values in distinguishing acute ischemic stroke, old cerebral infarction and leukoaraiosis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Current and Future Applications of Arterial Spin Labeling MRI in Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Non-Contrast MRI Sequences for Ischemic Stroke: A Concise Overview for Clinical Radiologists.Vascular health and risk management · 2024Review
- Neuroimaging Modalities Used for Ischemic Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- A Short Review on Advances in Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.Galen medical journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and disability. The only effective non-surgical treatment for acute ischemic stroke within three to four and a half hours of the onset of symptoms is thrombolytic therapy. Time is of the essence when diagnosing and treating an acute ischemic stroke. After evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of thrombolysis, selecting the ideal patient for the indication is essential. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is more sensitive and specific than Computed Tomography (CT) scans when identifying acute ischemic stroke. In approximately 80% of cases, infarcts are detectable within the first 24 hours. MRI can detect an ischemic stroke within a few hours of its onset. Multimodal imaging provides information for the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, patient selection for thrombolytic therapy, and prognosis estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.