Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035037›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Topical Biological Agents as Adjuncts to Improve Wound Healing in Chronic Diabetic Wounds: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence and Future Directions.

Andrew Yew Wei Wong, Bernard Soon Yang Ong, Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee, Aaron Shengting Mai, Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan, Satish R Lakshminarasappa, Sook Muay Tay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Glycogen Hydrogel Loaded withBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. L-PRF in extra-oral wound care.Periodontology 2000 · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Design, Development andRecent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew Yew Wei WongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Bernard Soon Yang OngYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin LeeYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Aaron Shengting MaiYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Sathiyamoorthy SelvarajanAnatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Satish R LakshminarasappaAnatomy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SGP.
Sook Muay TaySurgical Intensive Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a leading chronic illness in the modern world and 19-34% develop chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in their lifetime, often necessitating amputation. The reduction in tissue growth factors and resulting imbalance between proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors, along with systemic factors impairing healing appear particularly important in chronic wounds. Growth factors applied topically have thus been suggested to be a non-invasive, safe, and cost-effective adjunct to improve wound healing and prevent complications. Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed to identify clinical evidence and ongoing trials. The risk of bias analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a topical biologic growth factor-containing regimen to any other regimen. Primary outcomes of interest were time to wound closure, healing rate, and time. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse events such as infection. A total of 41 trials from 1992-2020 were included in this review, with a total recorded 3,112 patients. Platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF) in the form of becaplermin gel are likely to reduce the time of closure, increase the incidence of wound closure, and complete wound healing. Human umbilical cord-related treatments, dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA), and hypothermically stored amniotic membrane (HSAM), consistently increased the rates and incidence of complete ulcer healing while reducing ulcer size and time to complete ulcer healing. Fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF1) showed only a slight benefit in multiple studies regarding increasing complete ulcer healing rates and incidence while reducing ulcer size and time to complete ulcer healing, with a few studies showing no statistical difference from placebo. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is consistent in reducing the time to complete ulcer healing and increasing wound healing rate but may not reduce ulcer size or increase the incidence of complete ulcer healing. Targeting the wound healing pathway via the extrinsic administration of growth factors is a promising option to augment wound healing in diabetic patients. Growth factors have also shown promise in specific subgroups of patients who are at risk of significantly impaired wound healing such as those with a history of secondary infection and vasculopathy. As diabetes impairs multiple stages of wound healing, combining growth factors in diabetic wound care may prove to be an area of interest. Evidence from this systematic literature review suggests that topical adjuncts probably reduce time to wound closure, reduce healing time, and increase the healing rate in patients with chronic DFUs.

Indexed as

diabetic foot ulcerepidermal growth factorfibroblast growth factorhuman umbilical cordplatelet-derived growth factorplatelet-rich fibrinvascular endothelial growth factorwound healing

Identifiers

PMID36035037
PMCPMC9398533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.