ReviewCureus2022
Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Strategies for Assessing Suicidal Behavior and Mental Illness: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application and effectiveness of artificial intelligence in adolescent mental health support and therapy: a scoping review.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Pilot Qualitative Study to Better Understand the Factors Related to Suicides and Inform Public Health Action Across a Predominantly Coastal and Rural Area: Cornwall, Southwest of England.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in the Field of Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Psychotherapy, artificial intelligence and adolescents: ethical aspects.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in suicide prevention: Utilizing deep learning approach for early detection.Industrial psychiatry journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental illness leading to suicide attempts is prevalent in a large portion of the population especially in low and middle-income nations. There remains a significant social stigma associated with mental illness that can lead to stigmatization of patients. Hence, patients are reluctant to communicate their problems to health care providers. Physicians have difficulty in timely identification of patients at risk for suicide. Novel and rigorously designed strategies are needed to determine the population at risk for suicide. This would be the first step in overcoming the multitude of barriers in the management of mental illness. Clinical tools and the use of electronic medical records (EMR) are time intensive. Recently, several artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive technologies have gained momentum. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent advances in this landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.