ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Transcriptome analysis of well-differentiated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells in below-background environment.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Inhibitory Effects of the Deep Underground Low Background Radiation Environment on the Proliferation and Migration of NP69 Human Nasopharyngeal Epithelial Cells and the Underlying Mechanisms].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Progress in biological and medical research in the deep underground: an update.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preliminary research has shown an inhibited growth rate of well-differentiated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells (FD-LSC-1) in below-background radiation (BBR), but how the cells respond to this environmental stress and the potential mechanisms are yet unknown. The current study aimed to reveal the molecular differences in cells grown under BBR conditions and normal radiation at the transcriptional level. Methods: The expression profiles between FD-LSC-1 cells grown in a deep underground laboratory and above ground laboratory collected on day 4 were investigated by whole-transcriptome analysis, including messenger RNAs (mRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs). Functional analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment were then implemented for differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs and target genes of lncRNAs and circRNAs. Co-expression levels and the Bayesian network of DE genes were subsequently constructed, and the reliability of expression patterns were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: The study identified a total of 671 mRNAs, 286 lncRNAs, 489 circRNAs, and 6 miRNAs as significantly expressed in response to the environmental stress. The GO annotations regarding the biological processes category were mainly biological regulation, metabolic process, response to stimulus, cell cycle, and modification process. The KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that TGF-β and Hippo signaling played a crucial role in the transcriptional regulation of FD-LSC-1 cell growth under background radiation. Further network construction suggested that the enriched KEGG pathways affected this process by regulating cell proliferation-related genes including Conclusions: Below-background radiation can lead to transcriptional changes in FD-LSC-1 cells cultured in the deep underground. The inhibitory growth effect is associated with multiple biological processes as well as canonical pathways of proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.