Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035000›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Early administration of dobutamine in the treatment of septic shock patients with tumor-a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Ya-Fei Wu, Yin Pan, Qiang Tang, Ning Lou, Dao-Feng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ya-Fei Wu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Yin Pan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Qiang TangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Ning LouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Dao-Feng WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies have found that dobutamine may be beneficial to protect organs function in patients with septic shock, but there is still a lack of relevant research in septic shock patients with tumor. The study sought to explore the role of the early administration of dobutamine in the treatment of septic shock patients with tumors. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of tumor patients who developed septic shock at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2008 and November 2021. All the patients were divided into the following 3 groups: (I) the early administration group (<3 days, n=15); (II) the late administration group (≥3 days, n=22); and (III) the non-administration group (n=85). The primary observation indicator was 28-day mortality, and the secondary observation indicators included the shock reversal rate, the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the duration of mechanical ventilation. There was no statistical difference in the basic data of the three groups. Results: The early administration group had a significant decrease in 28-day mortality compared to the late and non-administration groups (log-rank P=0.018). The comparison between the groups showed that the 28-day mortality of the early administration group was significantly lower than that of the non-administration group [20.0% Conclusions: Early use of dobutamine may be beneficial to reduce the in-hospital mortality of septic shock patients with tumor, but the sample size of this study was small, which still needs to be confirmed by a multi-center randomized controlled clinical study.

Indexed as

Dobutamineseptic cardiomyopathyseptic shocktumor

Identifiers

PMID36035000
PMCPMC9403911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.