Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034884›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for survey design.

Jeffery Hill, Kathleen Ogle, Sally A Santen, Michael Gottlieb, Anthony R Artino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Best practices for reporting survey-based research.AEM education and training · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffery HillUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-3022
Kathleen OgleGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-0895
Sally A SantenUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8002
Michael GottliebRush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
Anthony R ArtinoGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-7853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveys are ubiquitous in medical education. They can be valuable for assessment across a wide range of applications and are frequently used in medical education research. This Educator's Blueprint paper reviews the best practices in survey design with a focus on survey development. Key components of the survey design process include determining whether a survey is the right tool, using an intentional approach to content development, and following best practices in item writing and formatting. These processes are meant to help educators and researchers design better surveys for making better decisions.

Identifiers

PMID36034884
PMCPMC9399445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.