Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034786›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

A compatibility evaluation between the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and the compartmental PK model using the lumping method with real cases.

Hyo-Jeong Ryu, Won-Ho Kang, Taeheon Kim, Jae Kyoung Kim, Kwang-Hee Shin, Jung-Woo Chae, Hwi-Yeol Yun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyo-Jeong RyuDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Won-Ho KangDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Taeheon KimDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Jae Kyoung KimDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
Kwang-Hee ShinResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Jung-Woo ChaeDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Hwi-Yeol YunDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling is a useful method for investigating drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The most commonly used mathematical models in PK modeling are the compartment model and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Although the theoretical characteristics of each model are well known, there have been few comparative studies of the compatibility of the models. Therefore, we evaluated the compatibility of PBPK and compartment models using the lumping method with 20 model compounds. The PBPK model was theoretically reduced to the lumped model using the principle of grouping tissues and organs that show similar kinetic behaviors. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) based on the simulated concentration and PK parameters (drug clearance [

Indexed as

compartment modelcompatibilitylumping methodpharmacokinetic modelingphysiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model

Identifiers

PMID36034786
PMCPMC9413202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.