Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2022

Gender differences in the experience of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.

Sula S Windgassen, Susanna Sutherland, Michael T M Finn, Kemberlee R Bonnet, David G Schlundt, W Stuart Reynolds, Roger R Dmochowski, Lindsey C McKernan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome in Men.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interstitial cystitis-an imbalance of risk and protective factors?Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sula S WindgassenDepartment of Health Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Susanna SutherlandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Michael T M FinnHelen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.
Kemberlee R BonnetDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
David G SchlundtDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
W Stuart ReynoldsDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Roger R DmochowskiDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Lindsey C McKernanDepartment of Health Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Optimizing Psychosocial Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain SyndromeK23DK118118 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MCKERNAN, LINDSEY COLMAN · 2019 to 2022
$810k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022990NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK118118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study assessed gender differences in a debilitating urologic pain condition, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). We aimed to (1) evaluate how pain, symptom, and distress profiles of IC/BPS may differ between genders and (2) obtain in-depth firsthand accounts from patients to provide additional insight into their experiences that may explain potential gender differences. Methods: A mixed methods approach combined validated patient-reported outcome measures with a single timepoint 90-min focus group. Tests of summary score group differences between men and women were assessed across questionnaires measuring urologic symptoms, pain, emotional functioning, and diagnostic timeline. Qualitative analysis applied an inductive-deductive approach to evaluate and compare experiences of living with IC/BPS Group narratives were coded and evaluated thematically by gender using the biopsychosocial model, providing insight into the different context of biopsychosocial domains characterizing the male and female experience of IC/BPS. Results: Thirty-seven participants [women ( Conclusion: The findings indicate different pain experiences and treatment needs between genders in persons experiencing urologic pain and urinary symptoms, with potential intervention implications. Results suggest gender health inequality in medical interactions in this urologic population needing further investigation.

Indexed as

interstitial cystitislower urinary tract symptom (LUTS)patient acceptance of health carepsychosocial interventionqualitative—quantitative analysissex characteristicssexism

Identifiers

PMID36034752
PMCPMC9404297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.