Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034741›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in endocrine and metabolic research2022

Data integration and mechanistic modelling for breast cancer biology: Current state and future directions.

Hanyi Mo, Rainer Breitling, Chiara Francavilla, Jean-Marc Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanyi MoDivision of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Rainer BreitlingManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Chiara FrancavillaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Jean-Marc SchwartzDivision of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers threatening women worldwide. A limited number of available treatment options, frequent recurrence, and drug resistance exacerbate the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Thus, there is an urgent need for methods to investigate novel treatment options, while taking into account the vast molecular heterogeneity of breast cancer. Recent advances in molecular profiling technologies, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics data, enable approaching breast cancer biology at multiple levels of omics interaction networks. Systems biology approaches, including computational inference of 'big data' and mechanistic modelling of specific pathways, are emerging to identify potential novel combinations of breast cancer subtype signatures and more diverse targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDeep learningMulti-omics modellingNetwork biologyPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID36034741
PMCPMC9402443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.