ReviewCluster computing2023
A survey of uncover misleading and cyberbullying on social media for public health.
Review in Cluster computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge and attitude toward oral health behavior of overseas students during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Article
- Health Misinformation Detection: Approaches, Challenges and Opportunities.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misleading health information is a critical phenomenon in our modern life due to advance in technology. In fact, social media facilitated the dissemination of information, and as a result, misinformation spread rapidly, cheaply, and successfully. Fake health information can have a significant effect on human behavior and attitudes. This survey presents the current works developed for misleading information detection (MLID) in health fields based on machine learning and deep learning techniques and introduces a detailed discussion of the main phases of the generic adopted approach for MLID. In addition, we highlight the benchmarking datasets and the most used metrics to evaluate the performance of MLID algorithms are discussed and finally, a deep investigation of the limitations and drawbacks of the current progressing technologies in various research directions is provided to help the researchers to use the most proper methods in this emerging task of MLID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.