ArticleResuscitation plus2022
A scoping review to determine the barriers and facilitators to initiation and performance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during emergency calls.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Bystanders Skip CPR: Insights from a Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Barriers to bystander interventions in suspected opioid-associated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A multiple methods study of 9-1-1 calls.Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Experiences, challenges, and best practices of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a scoping review.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Legislative Status of Public-Access Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - China, 2024.China CDC weekly · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Animated Images in First Aid for Infants with Foreign Body Airway Obstruction: A Simulation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Barriers for Responding to Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Emergency Medical Calls: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning innovations in CPR: a comprehensive survey on enhanced resuscitation techniques.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Barriers and Willingness to Undertake Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reported by Medical Students Dependent on Their Place of Residence-A Single-Center Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Optimizing dispatcher-bystander dyadic collaboration in emergency medical communication to improve cardiac arrest response.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Barriers to successful dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Willingness and Barriers to Undertaking Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reported by Medical Students after the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic-Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- A systematic review of interventions for resuscitation following drowning.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To maximise out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients' survival, bystanders should perform continuous, good quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until ambulance arrival. Objectives: To identify published literature describing barriers and facilitators between callers and call-takers, which affect initiation and performance (continuation and quality) of bystander CPR (B-CPR) throughout the OHCA emergency call. Eligibility criteria: Studies were included if they reported on the population (emergency callers and call-takers), concept (psychological, physical and communication barriers and facilitators impacting the initiation and performance of B-CPR) and context (studies that analysed OHCA emergency calls). Sources of evidence: Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and ProQuest were searched from inception to 9 March 2022. Charting methods: Study characteristics were extracted and presented in a narrative format accompanied by summary tables. Results: Thirty studies identified factors that impacted B-CPR initiation or performance during the emergency call. Twenty-eight studies described barriers to the provision of CPR instructions and CPR initiation, with prominent themes being caller reluctance (psychological), physical ability (physical), and callers hanging up the phone prior to CPR instructions (communication). There was little evidence examining barriers and facilitators to ongoing CPR performance (2 studies) or CPR quality (2 studies). Conclusions: This scoping review using emergency calls as the source, described barriers to the provision of B-CPR instructions and B-CPR initiation. Further research is needed to explore facilitators and barriers to B-CPR continuation and quality throughout the emergency call, and to examine the effectiveness of call-taker strategies to motivate callers to perform B-CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.