ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2019
Mobile High-Containment Biological Laboratories Deployment: Opportunities and Challenges in Expeditionary Deployments to Outbreak Response.
Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a One Health mobile laboratory workforce: strengthening public health preparedness across Europe and Africa.Human resources for health · 2026Article
- Biosecurity and Diagnosis of Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers: Strategic Considerations for Military Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mars Sample Return: From collection to curation of samples from a habitable world.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A review of emerging health threats from zoonotic New World mammarenaviruses.BMC microbiology · 2024Review
- Existing operational standards for field deployments of rapid response mobile laboratories: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- COVID-19: Postmortem Diagnostic and Biosafety Considerations.The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Existing biosafety guidelines and biosecurity policies do not adequately address the Increased deployment of mobile high-containment biological laboratories (MBSLs) to manage disease outbreak response demonstrates potentials for rapid diagnosis of risk group 3 and 4 pathogens and allows for research under the biosafety level (BSL)-4/3 environment. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate limitations in current biosafety and biosecurity guidelines to address the unique operational environment and new and varied international stakeholders involved in these deployments. Results: Current biosafety best practices guidelines and biosecurity policy and regulatory directives are crafted mostly toward conventional high-containment biological facilities and may not be readily applicable to the MBSLs. Although the pilot MBSLs reported in published literature have adopted multiple safety precautions to reduce exposure risks and have modified process flows in the constrained space to basically meet the proximate requirements for epidemic response, there are no systematic risk assessments for these sophisticated BSL-4/3 mobile laboratory infrastructure-deployed in locations with poor public health infrastructure backup and security problems and handling highly pathogenic agents in constrained environments-with potentials for failure, the nature and extent of which are yet to be determined. The probability of potential occupational exposure and risks to the local general environment may require a reassessment of the biosafety best practice management procedures for MBSLs to deal with these contingencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.