Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034632›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2019

Knowledge of Biosafety Among Workers in Private and Public Clinical and Research Laboratories in Morocco.

Tahar Bajjou, Yassine Sekhsokh, Idriss Lahlou Amine, Claudia Gentry-Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tahar BajjouMohammed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Yassine SekhsokhMohammed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Idriss Lahlou AmineMohammed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco.
Claudia Gentry-WeeksColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the biosafety knowledge among laboratory staff working in Morocco. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all laboratory staff in public and private clinical diagnostic and research laboratories between December 5, 2018, and January 5, 2018. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire distributed via Google Form. Results: A total of 235 participants completed the study questionnaire with an estimated response rate of 19%. Overall, 79% of respondents had a high or intermediate level of knowledge. Only 17.4% had participated in prior formal biosafety training courses. The level of knowledge did not differ significantly with gender or activity sector, but it increased with work experience. Knowledge was generally intermediate for signage and principles of biosafety levels (42.1%), low for distinction between technical operations that could pose a risk by generating aerosols (30.2%), and high for wearing personal protective equipment and its components (92.8%). There was a very high level of knowledge on proper waste sorting (100%). Conclusion: These findings underline the need for establishing a biosafety policy and strengthening biosafety training programs in laboratories in Morocco.

Indexed as

awarenessbiosafety trainingclinical laboratoriesMoroccosurvey

Identifiers

PMID36034632
PMCPMC9093238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.