Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034598›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2022

Application of Artificial Intelligence to Plasma Metabolomics Profiles to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Ehsan Irajizad, Ranran Wu, Jody Vykoukal, Eunice Murage, Rachelle Spencer, Jennifer B Dennison, Stacy Moulder, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Bora Lim, Jennifer Litton and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ehsan IrajizadDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Ranran WuDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jody VykoukalDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Eunice MurageDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Rachelle SpencerDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jennifer B DennisonDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Stacy MoulderDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Elizabeth RavenbergDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Bora LimBreast Cancer Research Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Jennifer LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Debu TripathymDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Senthil DamodaranDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Gaiane M RauchDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Beatriz AdradaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Rosalind CandelariaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jason B WhiteDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Abenaa BrewsterDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Banu ArunDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
James P LongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Kim Anh DoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sam HanashDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Johannes F FahrmannDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to identify biomarkers predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We previously obtained evidence that a polyamine signature in the blood is associated with TNBC development and progression. In this study, we evaluated whether plasma polyamines and other metabolites may identify TNBC patients who are less likely to respond to NACT. Pre-treatment plasma levels of acetylated polyamines were elevated in TNBC patients that had moderate to extensive tumor burden (RCB-II/III) following NACT compared to those that achieved a complete pathological response (pCR/RCB-0) or had minimal residual disease (RCB-I). We further applied artificial intelligence to comprehensive metabolic profiles to identify additional metabolites associated with treatment response. Using a deep learning model (DLM), a metabolite panel consisting of two polyamines as well as nine additional metabolites was developed for improved prediction of RCB-II/III. The DLM has potential clinical value for identifying TNBC patients who are unlikely to respond to NACT and who may benefit from other treatment modalities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkersdeep-learning modelneoadjuvant chemotherapypredictiontriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID36034598
PMCPMC9403735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.