Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034560›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Outcomes and comparations of pediatric surgery about choledochal cyst with robot-assisted procedures, laparoscopic procedures, and open procedures: A meta-analysis.

Siqi Xie, Yanbing Huang, Yuanbin He, Mingkun Liu, Dianming Wu, Yifan Fang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siqi XieDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yanbing HuangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yuanbin HeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Mingkun LiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Dianming WuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yifan FangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Choledochal cysts (CC) are rare disorders characterized by congenital biliary dilatation of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and always relate to pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Robot-assisted surgery has been able to complete almost all pediatric endoscopic surgery nowadays. But evidence of the post-operative outcomes of robotic-assisted operation is limited, comparing with the laparoscopic operation and traditional open operation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the advantages and deficiencies about robotic-assisted operation for CC. Methods: A meta-analysis of retrospective studies published in PUBMED, MEDLINE, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). No date limit was used, with the last search on April 30, 2022. No publication restrictions or study design filters were applied. Results: Nine retrospective cohort studies with 1,395 patients [366 in the robotic-assisted operation group (RG), 532 in the laparoscopic operation group (LG) and 497 in the open operation group (OG)] were enrolled in our study. Subgroup analysis demonstrated the RG had significant longer operative time [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.59, 95% CI = (0.02, 3.16), Conclusions: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted procedure are both safe and minimal invasive operational strategies. Robotic-assisted procedure may slowly surpass and has a trend to replace laparoscopy for its advantages. More experiences in robotic-assisted operation should be accumulated for the unexpected complexities, so as to be more stable in the younger age of children.

Indexed as

choledochal cyst (CC)laparoscopemeta-analysispediatric surgeryrobotic-assisted operation

Identifiers

PMID36034560
PMCPMC9403276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.