Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034545›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Antenatal urolithiasis: A case report.

Sumona Bose, Arpana Iyengar, Attibele Mahadevaiah Shubha

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumona BoseSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.
Arpana IyengarSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.
Attibele Mahadevaiah ShubhaSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although pediatric urolithiasis is an established entity, its antenatal diagnosis is rare. We hereby report a case detected at 20 weeks gestation and discuss the etiopathogenesis, predisposition, and surveillance following intervention. Case report: A 2-year-old girl with left renal pelvic calculus detected antenatally at 20 weeks was evaluated. Left hydronephrosis, obstructive pelvic calculus with a decrease in differential renal function on ethylene dicysteine (EC) renogram was confirmed. The metabolic workup was normal. Following stone extraction by left pyelolithotomy, a left ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to a mucosal valve was apparent which was excised and left pyeloplasty was done. Stone analysis revealed 100% cystine. Differential renal function and drainage improved post-surgery. The child, however, did not have a follow-up in the interim and presented with a recurrent stone one and a half years later. Conclusion: Knowledge of antenatal urolithiasis ensures continued follow-up, evaluation for metabolic disorders, and associated structural defects, especially with increasing stone size and increasing hydronephrosis. This helps in timely intervention and continued surveillance.

Indexed as

antenatalhydronephrosisobstructive calculussurgerysurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36034545
PMCPMC9403006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.