Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034430›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

The impact of levothyroxine therapy on the pregnancy, neonatal and childhood outcomes of subclinical hypothyroidism during pregnancy: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Xue-Feng Jiao, Miao Zhang, Jingjing Chen, Qiang Wei, Linan Zeng, Dan Liu, Chuan Zhang, Hailong Li, Kun Zou, Li Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xue-Feng JiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Miao ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jingjing ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiang WeiKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Linan ZengDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chuan ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hailong LiDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Kun ZouDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li ZhangKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.
Lingli ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CNNational Medical Products Administration · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the effect of levothyroxine (LT4) therapy in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). However, all these studies have clinical or methodological problems (such as adopting the old 2011 American Thyroid Association [ATA] diagnostic criteria, directly combining randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and cohort studies for meta-analysis, and so on), and cannot provide accurate and satisfactory results. Thus, we performed this updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess the effect of LT4 therapy in pregnant women with SCH, with the goal of providing more accurate and reliable evidence for clinical practice. Methods: We searched nine databases from inception to February 2022. The search strategy targeted the RCTs and cohort studies on pregnancy, neonatal and childhood outcomes following LT4 treatment in pregnant women with SCH based on the new 2017 ATA diagnostic criteria. We performed meta-analyses of RCTs and cohort studies separately, and further performed meta-analyses by excluding studies with high risk of bias. TSA was performed to test whether the current evidence was sufficient, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE method. Results: A total of 9 RCTs and 13 cohort studies comprising 11273 pregnant women with SCH were included. There were no statistically significant differences between LT4 group and control group in all primary and secondary outcomes, such as preterm delivery (RR=0.46, 95%CI: 0.19-1.09, Conclusion: Unlike previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, our study found no evidence of benefit of LT4 therapy on pregnancy, neonatal and childhood outcomes in pregnant women with SCH. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022321937, identifier CRD42022321937.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousHypothyroidismPremature BirthChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeThyroxineThyroxinechildhood outcomeslevothyroxineneonatal outcomespregnancy outcomessubclinical hypothyroidism during pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36034430
PMCPMC9400061
OpenAlexW4289860856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.