Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034402›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2022

INSPIRE: Safety and tolerability of inhaled Yutrepia (treprostinil) in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Nicholas S Hill, Jeremy P Feldman, Sandeep Sahay, Raymond L Benza, Ioana R Preston, David Badesch, Robert P Frantz, Savan Patel, Ashley Galloway, Todd M Bull and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: from classical treatments to new horizons.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas S HillTufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-8339
Jeremy P FeldmanArizona Pulmonary Specialists, Ltd Phoenix Arizona USA.
Sandeep SahayWeill Cornell Medicine, Houston Methodist Lung Center, Houston Methodist Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-1680
Raymond L BenzaThe Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
Ioana R PrestonTufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.
David BadeschAnschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver Aurora Colorado USA.
Robert P FrantzMayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Savan PatelLiquidia Technologies Morrisville North Carolina USA.
Ashley GallowayLiquidia Technologies Morrisville North Carolina USA.
Todd M BullAnschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Denver Aurora Colorado USA.
INSPIRE study investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The INSPIRE trial was a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter trial (LTI-301) that enrolled patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) ≥ 18 years of age who transitioned to Yutrepia from nebulized treprostinil (Transition) or added Yutrepia to prostacyclin naïve patients on ≤2 nonprostacyclin oral therapies. The objectives of the trial were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Yutrepia (dry-powder formulation of treprostinil) in patients with PAH. The primary safety measures were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Exploratory efficacy measures were also assessed during the trial. Transition patients initiated Yutrepia at a dose comparable to their nebulized treprostinil dose while prostacyclin naïve patients received 26.5-mcg QID; up-titration in 26.5-mcg increments was permitted for both groups. A total of 121 patients were enrolled, of which 29 patients discontinued from the trial, with the most common reason being AEs. Eighty percent of the Transition group and 96% of the prostacyclin naïve group titrated to a dose ≥79.5 mcg QID at Day 360, respectively, with one patient achieving a dose of 212-mcg QID. The most common AEs were cough, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, dyspnea, dizziness, throat irritation, diarrhea, chest discomfort, fatigue, and nasopharyngitis. Most of these events were considered treatment-related though mild to moderate in severity and expected for prostacyclin therapy administered by inhalation. In an evaluation of exploratory efficacy measures, patients remained stable or improved over the 1 year of treatment. Yutrepia was found to be a convenient, safe, and well-tolerated inhaled prostacyclin treatment option for PAH patients.

Indexed as

combination therapydry‐powder inhalerprostacyclinpulmonary arterial hypertensiontreprostinil

Identifiers

PMID36034402
PMCPMC9400582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.