Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034386›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Effect of cement distribution type on clinical outcome after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the aging population.

Chengqiang Zhou, Yifeng Liao, Shaolong Huang, Hua Li, Ziqiang Zhu, Li Zheng, Bin Wang, Yunqing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Comparative study on effectiveness of different puncture methods of flexible bone cement delivery device in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral upper 1/3 compression fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chengqiang ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yifeng LiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Shaolong HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Hua LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Ziqiang ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Li ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Bin WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yunqing WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effect of the type of bone cement distribution on clinical outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in the elderly. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 160 patients diagnosed with OVCF who underwent PVP treatment from March 2018 to December 2020. Based on the kind of postoperative bone cement distribution, bone cement was classified as types I, II, III, IV, and V. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle, anterior vertebral height ratio, refracture rate of injured vertebrae, and incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures were compared for the five types before and after three days, and one year of operation. Results: VAS and ODI at three days and one year postoperative were significantly lower than those preoperative ( Conclusions: The clinical efficacy of cement distribution following PVP of types I, II, and III is better than that of types IV and V, which can better relieve pain with long-lasting efficacy and minimize the occurrence of refractures of injured vertebrae and adjacent vertebral body fractures.

Indexed as

bone cement distributionclinical efficacyosteoporosisosteoporotic vertebral compression fracturepercutaneous vertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36034386
PMCPMC9405186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.