ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Characterizing Risk of In-Hospital Mortality Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which Intravenous Isotonic Fluid Offers Better Outcomes for Patients with a Brain Injury?Neurocritical care · 2025Review
- Predicting Mortality in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients Using Big Data and Machine Learning: A Nationwide Study in Türkiye.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Must-have Qualities of Clinical Research on Artificial Intelligence and Machine LearningBalkan medical journal · 2023Review
- Prediction of Mortality in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Relationship between baseline bicarbonate and 30-day mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- A nomogram for the prediction of short-term mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring mechanical ventilation: a post-hoc analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage has a high rate of disability and mortality, and the ability to use existing disease severity scores to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes is limited. Collect relevant information of patients during hospitalization to develop more accurate risk prediction models, using logistic regression (LR) and machine learning (ML) technologies, combined with biochemical information. Methods: Patient-level data were extracted from MIMIC-IV data. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The models were trained and tested on a data set (ratio 70:30) including age and key past medical history. The recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm was used to screen the characteristic variables; then, the ML algorithm was used to analyze and establish the prediction model, and the validation set was used to further verify the effectiveness of the model. Result: Of the 1,787 patients included in the mimic database, a total of 379 died during hospitalization. Recursive feature abstraction (RFE) selected 20 variables. After simplification, we determined 10 features, including the Glasgow coma score (GCS), glucose, sodium, chloride, SPO Conclusions: ML approaches significantly enhance predictive discrimination for mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to existing illness severity scores and LR. The discriminative ability of these ML models requires validation in external cohorts to establish generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.