Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Can the Full-Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Day Surgery Mode Achieve Better Outcomes Following Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol? A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Le Kou, Wentao Wan, Chao Chen, Dong Zhao, Xun Sun, Ziwei Gao, Hongjin Wu, Mingyuan Di, Xinlong Ma, Baoshan Xu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Percutaneous endoscopic treatment for lumbar disorders as day surgery: A-2-Year Follow-Up retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Le KouDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Wentao WanGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Dong ZhaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xun SunDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Ziwei GaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Hongjin WuGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Mingyuan DiGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xinlong MaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Baoshan XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jun MiaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, No.1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Full-percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (F-PELD) is a popular operation for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Some studies have reported that F-PELD in day surgery mode produced favorable outcomes for LDH. At the same time, minimally invasive spinal surgery following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) presents a rising trend in recent years, but few studies reported whether F-PELD will produce better outcomes in the day surgery (DS) mode combined with ERAS. Objective: To analyze whether F-PELD in day surgery mode following ERAS can produce better clinical outcomes than in traditional surgery mode. Methods: The patients who underwent F-PELD between January 2019 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients who met the inclusive criteria were followed up. The patients were divided into day surgery (DS) group ( Results: A total of 298 patients who underwent F-PELD were reviewed. 290 patients were included in the study and followed up, and 275 patients who had completed the follow-up were available for analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, preoperative VAS, and ODI. There were significant statistical differences in the VAS and ODI immediately after surgery (VAS for back pain: DS group 1.4 ± 1.1, TS group 2.0 ± 1.2, Conclusion: The F-PELD in day surgery mode following ERAS produced a better short-term clinical effect and reduced the LOS, which is worthy of promotion.

Indexed as

day surgeryendoscopyenhanced recovery after surgerylumbar disc herniationpercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Identifiers

PMID36034364
PMCPMC9407013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.