Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034359›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

Distal end of Double-J ureteral stent position on ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xingjun Bao, Fengze Sun, Huibao Yao, Di Wang, Hongquan Liu, Gonglin Tang, Xiaofeng Wang, Zhongbao Zhou, Jitao Wu, Yuanshan Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xingjun BaoSecond Clinical Medical College, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Fengze SunDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Huibao YaoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Di WangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Hongquan LiuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Gonglin TangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Zhongbao ZhouDepartment of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jitao WuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Yuanshan CuiDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most patients suffer from ureteral stent-related symptoms (USRS) caused by indwelling ureteral stents. Nevertheless, various medications to alleviate discomfort as well as novel stents are continually being developed, and in recent years, some researchers have believed that proper intravesical stent placement can relieve USRS. Objective: To determine appropriate intravesical ureteral stent position may alleviate USRS. Methods: Up to May 1, 2022, the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched, and two independent reviewers included relevant studies that met the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Studies methodological quality were assessed by ROB2 and ROBINS-I. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) was used to quantify the USRS. According to intravesical ureteral stent position, Group A was defined as the contralateral group, that is distal end of ureteral stent crossed the bladder midline, whereas Group B was classified as ipsilateral group, meaning stent end did not cross the midline. Results: Six studies incorporating a total of 590 patients were eligible. In terms of USSQ score, the meta-analysis showed that contralateral group was associated with a significant increase in USSQ total (MD, 17.55; 95% CI, 12.04 to 23.07; Conclusion: This meta-analysis proven that correct intravesical stent position was critical, and patients with stents crossing the midline experienced more severe USRS than those who did not. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to corroborate our findings.

Indexed as

bladder midlineIPSSmeta-analysisureteral stentUSRSUSSQ

Identifiers

PMID36034359
PMCPMC9411969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.