Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034331›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2022

Behavioural Response To Self-Medication Practice Before and During Covid-19 Pandemic in Western Uganda.

Samuel Sunday Dare, Ejike Daniel Eze, Isaac Echoru, Ibe Michael Usman, Fred Ssempijja, Edmund Eriya Bukenya, Robinson Ssebuufu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mucormycosis in COVID-19 pandemic: Risk factors and linkages.Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel Sunday DareSchool of Medicine, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-9818
Ejike Daniel EzeSchool of Medicine, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Isaac EchoruSchool of Medicine, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Ibe Michael UsmanFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-6624-1286
Fred SsempijjaFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-7185
Edmund Eriya BukenyaSchool of Medicine, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Robinson SsebuufuFaculty of Clinical Medicine and Dentistry, Kampala International University Teaching Hospital, Ishaka, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2053-1696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-medication has become a serious public health problem posing great risks, especially with the increasing number of cases of COVID-19 disease globally and in Uganda. This may be partly because of the absence of a recognized treatment for the disease, however, the differing prevalence and nature from country to country may influence human behavioral responses. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the behavioral response to self-medication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown in comparison to the pre-COVID period in Western Uganda. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to August 2020 in western Uganda using online Google forms and printed questionnaires to investigate the level of self-medication practice before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This included 280 participants, aged 18 and above who consented to participate in the study. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling technique, and sampling was done by sending a structured online questionnaire via Google forms and printed questionnaires to participants who did not use the online Google forms. Results: Respondents that knew about self-medication were 97% of the 272 participants. Those that are aware of self-medication, have heard about it either through different avenues. Respondents who practiced self-medication before the COVID-19 pandemic were 239 (88%); those who practiced self-medication during the COVID-19 pandemic were 156 (57%); those that did not were 115 (43%). There was a statistically significant decrease in the number of respondents who practice self-medication during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown compared to the practice before the pandemic lockdown. p < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (OR = 5.39, 95% CI = 3.48, 8.32). Conclusion: Our investigation showed adequate knowledge of self-medication and a high level of self-medication practice with a decrease in self-medication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown compared to the practice before the lockdown.

Indexed as

before and post COVID-19behavioural responseknowledgemedicationself-medication practice

Identifiers

PMID36034331
PMCPMC9400814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.