Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034316›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology and sociobiology2022

From collocations to call-ocations: using linguistic methods to quantify animal call combinations.

Alexandra B Bosshard, Maël Leroux, Nicholas A Lester, Balthasar Bickel, Sabine Stoll, Simon W Townsend

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping vocal interactions in space and time differentiates signal broadcast versus signal exchange in meerkat groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexandra B BosshardDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-5952
Maël LerouxDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicholas A LesterDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Balthasar BickelDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Sabine StollDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon W TownsendDepartment of Comparative Language Science, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Emerging data in a range of non-human animal species have highlighted a latent ability to combine certain pre-existing calls together into larger structures. Currently, however, the quantification of context-specific call combinations has received less attention. This is problematic because animal calls can co-occur with one another simply through chance alone. One common approach applied in language sciences to identify recurrent word combinations is collocation analysis. Through comparing the co-occurrence of two words with how each word combines with other words within a corpus, collocation analysis can highlight above chance, two-word combinations. Here, we demonstrate how this approach can also be applied to non-human animal signal sequences by implementing it on artificially generated data sets of call combinations. We argue collocation analysis represents a promising tool for identifying non-random, communicatively relevant call combinations and, more generally, signal sequences, in animals. Significance statement: Assessing the propensity for animals to combine calls provides important comparative insights into the complexity of animal vocal systems and the selective pressures such systems have been exposed to. Currently, however, the objective quantification of context-specific call combinations has received less attention. Here we introduce an approach commonly applied in corpus linguistics, namely collocation analysis, and show how this method can be put to use for identifying call combinations more systematically. Through implementing the same objective method, so-called call-ocations, we hope researchers will be able to make more meaningful comparisons regarding animal signal sequencing abilities both within and across systems. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-022-03224-3.

Indexed as

Call combinationsCollocation analysisComparative approachNon-random structureSyntax

Identifiers

PMID36034316
PMCPMC9395491
OpenAlexW4292590434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.