ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Case report: Bilateral spinal neurofibromatosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal neurofibromatosis (SNF) is a rare form of Neurofibromatosis in which neurofibromas exist bilaterally throughout all spinal roots. Despite previous attempts made to characterize and classify the disease as a separate clinical form of the disease, the low incidence rate of the disease and scarcity of previous reports calls for further studies and reports to elaborate this clinical entity. The patient in this report was a 36-year-old man presenting with lower limb weakness, unsteady gait, and paresthesia. The patient also presented with multiple cutaneous café-au-lait spots, cutaneous neurofibromas, and a large neurocutaneous neurofibroma of right facial nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine revealed bilateral spinal neurofibromas across all spinal cord roots. MRI study of head revealed no abnormalities in the brain and optic tract. The patient fulfilled both NIH criteria as well as revised criteria for NF1. Despite total spinal cord involvement, surgical intervention was withheld from the patient due to high propensity of recurrence as seen with previous attempts in removing peripheral neurofibromas, slow progression of symptoms, and lack of significant pain and impairment. SNF is often described as a form of disease with infrequent presentation of classical NF1 symptoms other than spinal tumors. The case presented here however, presented with several cutaneous neurofibromas and café-au-lait spots. Considering the positive outcome of surgical intervention in a few other reports, the decision to surgically intervene should be left to the clinical judgement of the participating surgeon, patient preference and socioeconomic background in a case-by-case manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.