ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Research on Improving Radiotherapy Accuracy Based on Image-Guided Radiotherapy.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Thoracic Absorption Dose and Secondary Tumor Risk Caused by Different Imaging Methods in Image-Guided Particle Radiotherapy.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Does deformation of immobilization devices impact treatment accuracy in thoracic cancer radiotherapy?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Retracted: Research on Improving Radiotherapy Accuracy Based on Image-Guided Radiotherapy.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/28B8EF28104557FC2194BDA0625903
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the changes of people's diet and lifestyle, the number of patients with abdominal malignant tumors is increasing year by year. In order to analyze the effectiveness of cone-beam CT (CBCT) enhancement technology in improving the accuracy of radiotherapy for clinical malignant tumors, 92 patients with abdominal malignant tumor are divided into the control group and the CBCT radiotherapy group. The experimental results show that precise radiotherapy technology can promote the recovery of the immune function of patients with abdominal malignant tumors, improve the effect of treatment, and decrease the incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.