Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034161›Full record

ArticleApplied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment2021

Phytostabilization of acidic mine tailings with biochar, biosolids, lime, and locally-effective microbes: Do amendment mixtures influence plant growth, tailing chemistry, and microbial composition?

Kristin M Trippe, Viola A Manning, Catherine L Reardon, Ann M Klein, Clara Weidman, Thomas F Ducey, Jeff M Novak, Donald W Watts, Hannah Rushmiller, Kurt A Spokas and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied soil ecology : a section of Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Situ Remediation Technology for Heavy Metal Contaminated Sediment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin M TrippeUSDA-ARS Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR.
Viola A ManningUSDA-ARS Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR.
Catherine L ReardonUSDA-ARS, Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, Adams, OR.
Ann M KleinUSDA-ARS, Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, Adams, OR.
Clara WeidmanUSDA-ARS Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR.
Thomas F DuceyUSDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Soil, Water, and Plant Conservation Research Unit, Florence, SC.
Jeff M NovakUSDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Soil, Water, and Plant Conservation Research Unit, Florence, SC.
Donald W WattsUSDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Soil, Water, and Plant Conservation Research Unit, Florence, SC.
Hannah RushmillerUSDA-ARS, Coastal Plain Soil, Water, and Plant Conservation Research Unit, Florence, SC.
Kurt A SpokasUSDA-ARS, Soil and Water Management Research Unit, Saint Paul, MN.
James A IppolitoDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Mark G JohnsonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR.
National Forage Seed Production Research Center · USAgricultural Research Service · USColorado State University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abandoned mine lands present persistent environmental challenges to ecosystems and economies; reclamation an important step for overcoming these challenges. Phytostabilization is an elegant and cost-effective reclamation strategy, however, establishing plants on severely degraded soils is problematic, often requiring soil amendment additions. We evaluated whether amendment mixtures composed of lime, biochar, biosolids, and locally effective microbes (LEM) could alleviate the constraints that hinder phytostabilization success. We hypothesized that 1) plants grown in tailings amended with lime, biochar, and biosolids (LBB) would establish faster and grow larger than plants grown in tailings amended with lime only, and 2) the LEM source would influence microbial community function and structure in amended mine tailings. We conducted a greenhouse study that simulated

Indexed as

Biocharlocally effective microbesmine remediationphytostabilization

Identifiers

PMID36034161
PMCPMC9403907
OpenAlexW3136480014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.