Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034114›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Spontaneous brain activity, graph metrics, and head motion related to prospective post-traumatic stress disorder trauma-focused therapy response.

Remko van Lutterveld, Tim Varkevisser, Karlijn Kouwer, Sanne J H van Rooij, Mitzy Kennis, Martine Hueting, Simone van Montfort, Edwin van Dellen, Elbert Geuze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Remko van LutterveldBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tim VarkevisserBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Karlijn KouwerBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sanne J H van RooijDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Mitzy KennisARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, ARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands.
Martine HuetingBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Simone van MontfortDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Edwin van DellenDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Elbert GeuzeBrain Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Defence, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ministry of Defence · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLArq Psychotrauma Expert Group · NLEmory University · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Effect of TMS on PTSD Neuroimaging and Psychophysiological BiomarkersK01MH121653 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ROOIJ, SANNE JH · 2020 to 2024
$894k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma-focused psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is effective in about half of all patients. Investigating biological systems related to prospective treatment response is important to gain insight in mechanisms predisposing patients for successful intervention. We studied if spontaneous brain activity, brain network characteristics and head motion during the resting state are associated with future treatment success. Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 46 veterans with PTSD around the start of treatment. Psychotherapy consisted of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (tf-CBT), eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), or a combination thereof. After intervention, 24 patients were classified as treatment responders and 22 as treatment resistant. Differences between groups in spontaneous brain activity were evaluated using amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), while global and regional brain network characteristics were assessed using a minimum spanning tree (MST) approach. In addition, in-scanner head motion was assessed. Results: No differences in spontaneous brain activity and global network characteristics were observed between the responder and non-responder group. The right inferior parietal lobule, right putamen and left superior parietal lobule had a more central position in the network in the responder group compared to the non-responder group, while the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right inferior frontal gyrus and left inferior temporal gyrus had a less central position. In addition, responders showed less head motion. Discussion: These results show that areas involved in executive functioning, attentional and action processes, learning, and visual-object processing, are related to prospective PTSD treatment response in veterans. In addition, these findings suggest that involuntary micromovements may be related to future treatment success.

Indexed as

DLPFCgraph analysishead motionminimum spanning treepost-traumatic stress disorderpsychotherapyPTSD

Identifiers

PMID36034114
PMCPMC9413840
OpenAlexW4291142652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.