ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022
Non-fatal overdose risk during and after opioid agonist treatment: A primary care cohort study with linked hospitalisation and mortality records.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of relaxing restrictions on take-home doses during the COVID-19 pandemic on program effectiveness and client experiences in opioid agonist treatment: a mixed methods systematic review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023Pooled it
- Comprehensive needle and syringe program and opioid agonist therapy reduce HIV and hepatitis c virus acquisition among people who inject drugs in different settings: A pooled analysis of emulated trials.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Risk of opioid overdose during buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder in the fentanyl era.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
- The Effect of Opioid Agonist Treatment on Injection-Related Sequelae: A Population-Based Observational Study.Drug safety · 2025Observational
- Motivations underlying co-use of benzodiazepines and opioids in the UK: a qualitative study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- A qualitative study of benzodiazepine/z-drug and opioid co-use patterns and overdose risk.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Initiation of opioid agonist treatment following hospital-treated opioid toxicities and the risk of repeat events in Ontario, Canada: a cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weights.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Risk of Falls and Fractures in Individuals With Cataract, Age-Related Macular Degeneration, or Glaucoma.JAMA ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Clinician Perspectives on a Predictive Model for Recommending Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Clinician and Practice Characteristics Associated With Support of Office-based Methadone: Findings From a National Survey.Journal of addiction medicineArticle
- Piloting a Hospital-Based Rapid Methadone Initiation Protocol for Fentanyl.Journal of addiction medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The initiation and cessation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) have both been associated with elevated risk of fatal overdose. We examined risk of non-fatal overdose during OAT initiation and cessation and specifically between methadone versus buprenorphine recipients. Methods: We utilised primary care electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to delineate a study cohort of adults aged 18-64 who were prescribed OAT between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2017. These records were linked to hospitalisation, mortality records and patient neighbourhood and practice-level Index of Multiple Deprivation quintiles. With inverse probability treatment weights applied and negative binomial regression models we estimated incidence rate ratios for hospital admissions among patients who experienced multiple overdoses. Findings: A total of 20898 patients were prescribed methadone or buprenorphine over 83856 person-years of follow-up. Compared with periods in treatment, patients not in treatment were 51% more likely to experience a non-fatal overdose that required hospitalisation (weighted rate ratio, wRR 1·51; 95% CI 1·42, 1·60), especially during the four weeks of OAT initiation (5·59; 5·31, 5·89) and following cessation (13·39; 12·78, 14·03). The wRR of overdose during (0·37; 0·34, 0·39) and after treatment (0·36; 0·34, 0·38) favoured buprenorphine compared to methadone. Interpretation: OAT is associated with decreased non-fatal overdose risk. Buprenorphine may act more protectively than methadone, especially during the first four weeks of treatment. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC-2016-003).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.