Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36034050›Full record

ArticleExpert systems with applications2022

Binary Simulated Normal Distribution Optimizer for feature selection: Theory and application in COVID-19 datasets.

Shameem Ahmed, Khalid Hassan Sheikh, Seyedali Mirjalili, Ram Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems with applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shameem AhmedDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.
Khalid Hassan SheikhDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.
Seyedali MirjaliliKing Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ram SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification accuracy achieved by a machine learning technique depends on the feature set used in the learning process. However, it is often found that all the features extracted by some means for a particular task do not contribute to the classification process. Feature selection (FS) is an imperative and challenging pre-processing technique that helps to discard the unnecessary and irrelevant features while reducing the computational time and space requirement and increasing the classification accuracy. Generalized Normal Distribution Optimizer (GNDO), a recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithm, can be used to solve any optimization problem. In this paper, a hybrid version of GNDO with Simulated Annealing (SA) called Binary Simulated Normal Distribution Optimizer (BSNDO) is proposed which uses SA as a local search to achieve higher classification accuracy. The proposed method is evaluated on 18 well-known UCI datasets and compared with its predecessor as well as some popular FS methods. Moreover, this method is tested on high dimensional microarray datasets to prove its worth in real-life datasets. On top of that, it is also applied to a COVID-19 dataset for classification purposes. The obtained results prove the usefulness of BSNDO as a FS method. The source code of this work is publicly available at https://github.com/ahmed-shameem/Feature_selection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmCOVID-19Feature selectionGeneralized Normal Distribution OptimizerMeta-heuristicOptimizationSimulated annealing

Identifiers

PMID36034050
PMCPMC9396289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.