Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033935›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2019

An Evaluation of Monitoring Surveys of the Quarantine Bacterium

Marco Scortichini, Gianluigi Cesari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Decade after the Outbreak ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Aphrophoridae Role inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Progress towards Sustainable Control ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Soil and Leaf Ionome Heterogeneity inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco ScortichiniCouncil for Agricultural Research and the Analysis of Agricultural Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Olive, Fruit Trees and Citrus, Caserta, Italy.
Gianluigi CesariSecretary Task force for Xylella fastidiosa, Regione Puglia, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Objectives: The primary objectives of the analysis were to start to collect epidemiological data on Methods: A total of 220 279 olive trees were inspected. Basic information on farm and trees management was obtained. A total of 13 706 olive trees were analyzed through serological and molecular techniques to verify the possible occurrence of the bacterium. Results: The cultivars "Nociara," "Cima di Melfi," and "Cellina di Nardò" showed the highest occurrence of decline symptoms. Tree age appears to be related to the incidence of decline symptoms. Olive trees growing in well-managed soils showed fewer symptoms than trees cultivated in farms where such agronomic techniques are not regularly performed. Conclusions: Implementation and utilization of reliable in situ detection techniques could increase the number of sampled trees in each plot, thus allowing a more extensive and robust assessment of

Indexed as

biocontainmentbiorisk managementinfectious agentinspectionpathogen

Identifiers

PMID36033935
PMCPMC9387734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.