Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033871›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Plant growth-promoting bacteria in metal-contaminated soil: Current perspectives on remediation mechanisms.

Yue Wang, Mathiyazhagan Narayanan, Xiaojun Shi, Xinping Chen, Zhenlun Li, Devarajan Natarajan, Ying Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rice Adaptation to Abiotic Stresses Caused by Soil Inorganic Elements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue WangCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Mathiyazhagan NarayananDivision of Research and Innovation, Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Xiaojun ShiCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Xinping ChenCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Zhenlun LiCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Devarajan NatarajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ying MaCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination in soils endangers humans and the biosphere by reducing agricultural yield and negatively impacting ecosystem health. In recent decades, this issue has been addressed and partially remedied through the use of "green technology," which employs metal-tolerant plants to clean up polluted soils. Furthermore, the global climate change enhances the negative effects of climatic stressors (particularly drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures), thus reducing the growth and metal accumulation capacity of remediating plants. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) have been widely introduced into plants to improve agricultural productivity or the efficiency of phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils

Indexed as

bioremediationclimatic stressesmetal bioavailabilitymetal detoxificationplant growth-promoting bacteria

Identifiers

PMID36033871
PMCPMC9404692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.