Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Breast and cervical cancer screening adherence in Jiangsu, China: An ecological perspective.

Yanjun Sun, Yuhao Ma, Menghan Cao, Zhiqing Hu, Wei Lin, Mingsheng Chen, Yuan He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prevalence of Breast Cancer Screening in Asia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanjun SunInstitute of Medical Humanities, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuhao MaInstitute of Medical Humanities, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Menghan CaoSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhiqing HuInstitute of Medical Humanities, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wei LinDepartment of Students Affairs, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Mingsheng ChenSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuan HeInstitute of Medical Humanities, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High screening coverage can effectively reduce the mortality in breast and cervical cancer. Further research on extending the coverage of breast and cervical cancer screening in China is required. This study explored factors influencing women's "two-cancer" screening service utilization using an ecological approach. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Health Services Survey (NHSS) conducted in 2018 in Jiangsu, China. A total of 3,500 women aged 18-64 years were included in the analysis. Chi-squared test, hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis, and binary logistic regression analysis were performed. Results: In total, 44.1% of the women had been screened for breast cancer (BC) and 40.9% for cervical cancer (CC). Breast cancer screening (BCS) and cervical cancer screening (CCS) differed significantly in the following common categories: age, gestational experiences, chronic disease status, body mass index (BMI), exercise, health checkup, marital status, number of children, employment, education, family doctors, and health records. In the results of hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis, the explanatory power of the final model was 37.5% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.812. The results showed that being in the age group of 35-64 years, having gestational experiences, having chronic diseases, exercising, having a health checkup, being married, having children, and being employed were statistically significant positive predictors of "two-cancer" screening adherence. The household size was a barrier. For BCS, obesity was also a negative factor, and a higher overall self-related health status was a positive factor. Being married and living in households of three or more families were not predictors. For CCS, having health records was also positively significant, while having chronic disease did not influence adherence. Conclusion: The findings provide an ecological explanation for women's BCS and CCS service utilization. Both proximal and distal factors should be considered to achieve a high coverage rate.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultChildChinaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle Agedbreast cancer screening (BCS)cancer preventioncervical cancer screening (CCS)ecological perspectivehierarchical multiple logistic regression

Identifiers

PMID36033808
PMCPMC9403787
OpenAlexW4291017263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.