Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033550›Full record

ArticleGerontechnology : international journal on the fundamental aspects of technology to serve the ageing society2021

Perceptions of older adults and health professionals about digital screening tools for elder mistreatment in the emergency department.

Esther K Choo, Chelsea Edwards, Malik Abuwandi, Kristina Carlson, Jennifer Bonito, Karen Jubanyik, Thomas M Gill, Fuad Abujarad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontechnology : international journal on the fundamental aspects of technology to serve the ageing society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esther K ChooCenter for Policy & Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Chelsea EdwardsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Malik AbuwandiArizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Kristina CarlsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jennifer BonitoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Karen JubanyikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Thomas M GillDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Fuad AbujaradDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Feasibility of Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)R01AG060084 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ABUJARAD, FUAD · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare settings represent a missed opportunity to systematically identify and address mistreatment. Objective: Our objective was to obtain perspectives of older adults, caregivers, and emergency care providers regarding screening and intervention for elder mistreatment in the emergency department (ED) with a focus on utilizing digital health tools to facilitate the process. These findings will inform the development of a Web-based, digital health tool optimized for a tablet device to educate, screen, and facilitate reporting of elder mistreatment among patients presenting to the ED. Method: We conducted a qualitative study utilizing three in-person focus groups (N=31) with older adults from the community, caregivers for older adults, and clinicians and social workers who worked in the ED. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we identified attitudes about the process of divulging abuse, attitudes towards the ED as the location for screening and information delivery, and perceptions of digital tools for screening and information. Results: Participants identified numerous challenges to the disclosure of mistreatment, including feelings of vulnerability and concerns about losing their homes, social supports, and connection to caregivers. In contrast, they were uncertain about the benefits of disclosure. Digital tools were seen as helpful in terms of overcoming numerous challenges to screening, but participants suggested maintaining a human element to interactions. Conclusion: While challenges to elder mistreatment screening were identified, participants had recommendations for optimizing such efforts and responded positively to digital health tools as a means of screening.

Indexed as

digital healthelder abuse screeningelder mistreatmentemergency caretechnology

Identifiers

PMID36033550
PMCPMC9409338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.