Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033528›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences.

Zhitong Ge, Yahong Wang, Ying Wang, Song Fang, Hongyan Wang, Jianchu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhitong GeDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yahong WangDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Song FangDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hongyan WangDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianchu LiDepartment of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. Materials and Method: From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized. Results: Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572-0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528-0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701-0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, "sieve hole sign" and "multi-track sign" were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU ( Conclusion: CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced ultrasoundconventional ultrasoundgynecological tumorintravenous leiomyomatosisultrasonic characteristics

Identifiers

PMID36033528
PMCPMC9403056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.