Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Effective dissecting range and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: Results of a large multicenter lateral node collaborative group in China.

Sicheng Zhou, Jianqiang Tang, Jianwei Liang, Zheng Lou, Wei Fu, Bo Feng, Yingchi Yang, Yi Xiao, Qian Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04850027 (MAgnetic Resonance Imaging Guided LAteral Lymph Node Dissection in Lower REctal Cancer - A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04850027 unknown statusnot on this map

MAgnetic Resonance Imaging Guided LAteral Lymph Node Dissection in Lower REctal Cancer - A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry Study (MALAREC)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2021 to 2025Enrolled268ConditionsRectal CancerArmsTME+Lateral lymph node dissection.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sicheng ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianqiang TangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianwei LiangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zheng LouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The first affiliated hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wei FuDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Bo FengDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yingchi YangDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yi XiaoDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qian LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis causes increased lateral local recurrence and poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance and effective range of dissection for the LPN dissection (LPND) in rectal cancer patients with LPN metastasis. Materials and methods: Through this large, multicenter retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of LPND. From January 2012 to December 2019, 387 rectal cancer patients with clinical evidence of LPN metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision with LPND were included in the study. According to pathological findings, they were divided into negative (n = 296) and positive (n = 91) LPN groups. Primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: The OS, RFS, and LRFS in the positive group were significantly worse than those in the negative group; However, LPN metastases were not independent prognostic risk factors for LRFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-7.64; Conclusions: LPND may be effective in controlling local recurrence in patients with LPN metastasis but not systemic metastases. Patients with LPN metastasis limited to the internal iliac and obturator regions achieve a long-term survival benefit from LPND, and their prognoses may be comparable to those at the N2b stage. Further metastasis to the external iliac or common iliac region should be considered systemic disease, and LPND should be avoided. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04850027.

Indexed as

lateral pelvic lymph nodelateral pelvic lymph node metastasisprognosisrectal cancersurgical dissection

Identifiers

PMID36033473
PMCPMC9413157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.