ArticleSSM - population health2022
Characterizing Nigerien men's social networks and their influence on family planning-related attitudes and behaviors.
Article in SSM - population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It's me who supports. How are you going to refuse to have a child?": the social norms and gender dynamics of men's engagement in family planning practices in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work uses data from a family planning (FP) program evaluation and social network study among men married to adolescent girls (ages 13-19) in Dosso, Niger to explore who influences their FP and through which social mechanisms. We asked men (N = 237) to nominate and describe their perceptions of key social contacts (alters). We sought to interview the most influential alter (N = 157 interviewed alters), asking them about their own FP-related attitudes and behaviors. Men primarily nominated male friends as alters. We found that men participating in the program were more likely to perceive alters to hold attitudes supportive of gender equitable FP decisions (AOR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.83, 10.35) and FP use (AOR: 4.22, 95% CI: 1.72, 10.35). Alters' attitudes supporting FP were related to those of the men who nominated them (1-unit increase in alters' attitudes score related to a 0.48 unit increase in men's attitudes; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63). Men who perceived their alters would support gender equitable FP decisions were more likely to have ever used FP methods (AOR: 10.43, 95% CI: 2.50, 43.58) as were those who perceived their alters would support their own FP use (AOR: 12.76, 95% CI: 2.55, 63.81). Men who perceived their alters would support gender equitable FP decisions were more likely to report spousal communication (AOR: 8.71, 95% CI: 3.06, 24.83), as were those who perceived that alters would support their own FP use (AOR: 9.06, 95% CI: 3.01, 27.26). Alters' and men's behaviors (contraceptive use and spousal communication) were not associated. These results demonstrate that perceived approval from network members may be critical to FP-related attitudes and behaviors. However, since FP promotion programs may affect perception and/or composition of social networks, future research should include larger sample sizes and longitudinal data to understand the effect of changing norms on social relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.