Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033320›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Multilayered bacterial cellulose/reduced graphene oxide composite films for self-standing and binder-free electrode application.

Nopparut Kiangkitiwan, Thanakorn Wasanapiarnpong, Kawee Srikulkit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nopparut KiangkitiwanDepartment of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thanakorn WasanapiarnpongDepartment of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kawee SrikulkitDepartment of Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilayered bacterial cellulose (MBC)/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composite films were fabricated using dyeing method. First, MBC films were constructed by the static culturing of kombucha SCOBY bacterial cellulose in a rectangular plastic mold for 15 days. The MBC formed on the air-liquid interface was collected and employed as the matrix for the preparation of MBC/rGO composite films using dyeing method. As found, the color strength increased with an increase in dyeing cycle due to MBC and GO (rGO precursor) affinity. However, the surface hydrophilicity was found in the opposite direction due to the restacking of hydrophobic rGO nanosheets onto MBC surface after reduction step. SEM images confirmed that MBC/rGO composite films obtained by the dyeing method exhibited the intact multilayer structure. The electrochemical behavior of free-standing and binder-free MBC/rGO electrodes was evaluated. It was found that MBC-1 exhibited the highest specific capacitance value of 192.23 F/g at the current density of 1 A/g (calculated from GCD plots) due to good diffusion of electrolyte arising from surface wettability with current density performance of 66 %. An increase in dyeing cycle (MBC-2, MBC-3, and MBC-4) led to a gradual decrease in the corresponding specific capacitance value due to a gradual increase in the electrolyte resistance derived from an increasing surface hydrophobicity of the composite films. Finally, in all cases, long-term cycle stability of more than 90 % up to 10000 cycles was achievable.

Indexed as

Bacterial cellulose/reduced graphene oxide composite filmFree-standing, and binder-free electrodeMultilayered bacterial cellulose

Identifiers

PMID36033320
PMCPMC9404351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.