Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033188›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Knee Osteotomies Can Be Performed Safely In An Ambulatory Setting.

Michael Doran, Anthony A Essilfie, Eoghan T Hurley, David A Bloom, Amit K Manjunath, Laith M Jazrawi, Eric J Strauss, Michael J Alaia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael DoranNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Anthony A EssilfieNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Eoghan T HurleyNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
David A BloomNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Amit K ManjunathNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Laith M JazrawiNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Eric J StraussNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Michael J AlaiaNew York University Langone Health, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of hospital admissions, inpatient conversions, reoperations, and complications associated with tibial tubercle osteotomies (TTO), high tibial osteotomies (HTO), and distal femoral osteotomies (DFO) performed at our ambulatory surgery center compared with our inpatient hospital facility. Methods: A retrospective review of patients receiving a TTO, HTO or DFO at our institution between June 2011 and October 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing the aforementioned procedures for malalignment, and a minimum of 90-days follow-up. Revision osteotomies, those undergoing an osteotomy for an acute fracture, and those with rule-out criteria for outpatient surgery (ASA > 3, and body mass index >40) were excluded. Complications, including readmission and reoperation, were compared between the two groups using either the Fisher's exact test and independent samples Results: The study included 531 patients undergoing osteotomies (222 ambulatory surgical center [ASC] and 309 hospital) with no patients lost to follow-up in the 90-day postoperative period. No patients operated on at an ASC required transfer to inpatient setting. There were no differences in complication rates, readmission, or reoperation rates among the two groups (4.1% vs 4.9%; Conclusions: Osteotomies about the knee performed in an ambulatory setting were safe, with no difference in readmission, reoperation, or postoperative complications compared to those performed at an inpatient hospital. Additionally, no patient required conversion from an outpatient to an inpatient setting. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiers

PMID36033188
PMCPMC9402466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.