Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033018›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Improved disease diagnosis system for COVID-19 with data refactoring and handling methods.

Ritesh Jha, Vandana Bhattacharjee, Abhijit Mustafi, Sudip Kumar Sahana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ritesh JhaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.
Vandana BhattacharjeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.
Abhijit MustafiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.
Sudip Kumar SahanaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel coronavirus illness (COVID-19) outbreak, which began in a seafood market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in mid-December 2019, has spread to almost all countries, territories, and places throughout the world. And since the fault in diagnosis of a disease causes a psychological impact, this was very much visible in the spread of COVID-19. This research aims to address this issue by providing a better solution for diagnosis of the COVID-19 disease. The paper also addresses a very important issue of having less data for disease prediction models by elaborating on data handling techniques. Thus, special focus has been given on data processing and handling, with an aim to develop an improved machine learning model for diagnosis of COVID-19. Random Forest (RF), Decision tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Support vector machine, and Deep Neural network (DNN) models are developed using the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (in São Paulo, Brazil) dataset to diagnose COVID-19. The dataset is pre-processed and distributed DT is applied to rank the features. Data augmentation has been applied to generate datasets for improving classification accuracy. The DNN model dominates overall techniques giving the highest accuracy of 96.99%, recall of 96.98%, and precision of 96.94%, which is better than or comparable to other research work. All the algorithms are implemented in a distributed environment on the Spark platform.

Indexed as

classificationCOVID-19data augmentationdata pre-processingdisease diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36033018
PMCPMC9416861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.