Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36033003›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

The actuality and influences of undergraduates' participation in high impact educational practices in Chinese universities.

Hu Ke, Ni Jianchao, Li Xiaojing, Zhou Xiting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hu KeSchool of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Ni JianchaoSchool of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Li XiaojingSchool of Marxism, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhou XitingInstitute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High Impact Educational Practices (HIPs) are effectively educational practices that have an important impact on student learning and development. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of different types of high-impact educational activities on students' learning outcomes. The data comes from the 2019 "tracking research survey on learning and development of Chinese college students," in which undergraduates from 39 Chinese colleges and universities participated. This study first clarified the concept and classification of high-impact educational activities, and then used multiple linear regression analysis to analyze the impact of three types of high-impact educational activities, including extended learning activities, research-related activities, and social practice activities, on students' learning gains. It's found that most Chinese college students do not perform well on HIPs, while the "Double First-Class" university students engage more than other colleges. Participating in HIPs has a significant impact on students' knowledge, ability and values, especially on the latter two. This study provides valuable enlightenment for universities on how to promote students' participation in high impact educational activities and improve the quality of higher education.

Indexed as

“Double First-Class” universityHigh Impact Educational Practiceslearning gainsstudent engagementundergraduates

Identifiers

PMID36033003
PMCPMC9412735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.