Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36032940›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Accurate image-based identification of macroinvertebrate specimens using deep learning-How much training data is needed?

Toke T Høye, Mads Dyrmann, Christian Kjær, Johnny Nielsen, Marianne Bruus, Cecilie L Mielec, Maria S Vesterdal, Kim Bjerge, Sigurd A Madsen, Mads R Jeppesen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Toke T HøyeDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads DyrmannDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian KjærDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Johnny NielsenDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marianne BruusDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cecilie L MielecDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Maria S VesterdalDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kim BjergeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sigurd A MadsenDepartment of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads R JeppesenDepartment of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Claus MelvadArctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-based methods for species identification offer cost-efficient solutions for biomonitoring. This is particularly relevant for invertebrate studies, where bulk samples often represent insurmountable workloads for sorting, identifying, and counting individual specimens. On the other hand, image-based classification using deep learning tools have strict requirements for the amount of training data, which is often a limiting factor. Here, we examine how classification accuracy increases with the amount of training data using the BIODISCOVER imaging system constructed for image-based classification and biomass estimation of invertebrate specimens. We use a balanced dataset of 60 specimens of each of 16 taxa of freshwater macroinvertebrates to systematically quantify how classification performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) increases for individual taxa and the overall community as the number of specimens used for training is increased. We show a striking 99.2% classification accuracy when the CNN (EfficientNet-B6) is trained on 50 specimens of each taxon, and also how the lower classification accuracy of models trained on less data is particularly evident for morphologically similar species placed within the same taxonomic order. Even with as little as 15 specimens used for training, classification accuracy reached 97%. Our results add to a recent body of literature showing the huge potential of image-based methods and deep learning for specimen-based research, and furthermore offers a perspective to future automatized approaches for deriving ecological data from bulk arthropod samples.

Indexed as

ArthropodsDeep LearningAnimalsBiological MonitoringFresh WaterNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceComputer visionEntomologyFreshwater faunaInvertebrate identificationMachine learningMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID36032940
PMCPMC9415355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.