ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022
Role of Hearing Screening in High-Risk Newborns.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study to evaluate the burden of hearing loss and its correlation with risk factors among high-risk infants at a teaching institution, Jaipur.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing is one of the very important five senses. The most important period for language and speech development is generally regarded as the first three years of life. For the past 20 years, electrophysiological methods are most commonly used which include otoacoustic emission (OAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR). Regardless of the screening method chosen, hearing screening, though critical, is only the first stage of a comprehensive early intervention plan. Screening alone is useless unless appropriate diagnostic testing services and high quality amplification and rehabilitation services are in place and are implemented in a timely fashion. Early screening does not substitute for further periodic childhood hearing screening. To screen the newborns which are high risk or born to high risk mother using optoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response (ABR). Also to co-relate hearing loss with various risk factors involved in pre-natal, natal and post-natal. Methods: we conducted a prospective study with 100 high risk newborns in a tertiary care centre. First, all babies were screened using transient evoked otoacoustic emission(TEOAE). Babies not responsive in this were screening again after 14 days using TEOAE. Babies who were reffered to during this screening with TEOAE were subjected to further screening with ABR to confirm the diagnosis. Out of 100 infants, 73% infants passed first screening by TEOAE whereas 27% failed. those 27 infants which failed were screened after 14 days, of them, 3 (11.1%) infants failed the second screening and were referred. Further screening with BERA was conducted for 3 children who failed the second screening by TEOAE. Of them 1 (33.3%) infant passed the BERA whereas 2 infants failed. Test of significance observed no statistically significant association of OAE with prenatal risk factors in present study (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.